Compound your own thinking.
saved from: claude · chatgpt · google docs
how: previous arguments come back before the next strategy session
Pricing strategy took shape across Claude, ChatGPT, co-founder pushback, and a Google Docs decision. 3ngram lets Founders build on yesterday's reasoning instead of relitigating the same per-seat versus usage debate.
A founder’s context window is the company. Strategy starts in Claude, gets challenged in ChatGPT, turns into a Google Doc, and comes back weeks later when the question still matters. The AI can keep up for a session. It cannot keep up for a quarter.
3ngram is the institutional system of record for operators who cannot afford to relitigate their own thinking. The arguments you have already had with your AI count. Yesterday’s pricing rationale, today’s co-founder pushback, and the final v0.4 decision all become one thread the next session can build on.
Claude argued against per-seat pricing 42 days ago. Today you open a new session and have to reconstruct the whole prosumer argument before anything useful happens.
3ngram: 3ngram hands the model the prior thread before you ask. The new session starts with the usage-with-a-floor rationale already in context.
ChatGPT helped revisit the landed cost model after your co-founder pushed back on usage pricing. That correction matters, but it lives in a different session from the original argument.
3ngram: 3ngram connects the pushback to the decision history. The next pricing pass includes both the original thesis and the pressure test.
The pricing v0.4 doc shows three options and one decision, but not the argument that got you there.
3ngram: 3ngram keeps the Claude thread, ChatGPT model, and Google Docs decision together, so the document is backed by the reasoning that produced it.
Make Your AI Compound With Your Thinking
3ngram keeps founder strategy threads connected across Claude, ChatGPT, and Google Docs, so the next session starts from the last real decision.
get started free ↵