← all comparisons
compare ·ChatGPT & Claude native memory vs. 3ngram

claude memory is great for 'remember my stack' and 'call me Olivia'.

it is not great for 'send the case study by Thursday' or 'what blocker did we leave unresolved in Cursor?' — that is not what it was built to do. chatgpt memory is a similar shape to claude's, and also locked to one platform. 3ngram works alongside both.

at a glance ·7 capabilities

ChatGPT & Claude native memory vs. 3ngram, side by side.

capability3ngramChatGPT & Claude native memory
what it doesshared work memory + follow-through + workflowsremembers preferences and conversation context
memory modeltyped — decisions, commitments, blockers, preferencesflat key-value / conversation summaries
follow-throughactive — overdue tracking, stale commitmentsnone, passive recall only
reusable workflowsstored prompts executable via MCPProjects / Custom GPTs (platform-locked)
cross-platformyes, same memory across any MCP clientno, each platform's memory stays there
programmableyes, full MCP APIno API for memory management
dashboardfull web dashboardbasic memory settings page
when to choose

ChatGPT & Claude native memory

you mainly need your AI to remember preferences and conversation context — coding style, dietary restrictions, project names. casual use.

when to choose

3ngram

you want AI work carried forward across platforms — decisions, commitments, blockers, source context, and reusable workflows included.

native memory remembers preferences. 3ngram carries real work forward.

3ngram is not a replacement — it is the layer that keeps decisions, commitments, blockers, and source context from leaking across AI sessions.